RAMBO

Inspiring

March 12th, 2018

Dibalik Kesuksesannya Menjadi Rambo, Ada Kisah Sedih Stallone Yang Tidak Banyak Diketahui

Sumber: https://www.theepochtimes.com/assets/upl

Inta Destria

Official Writer

 

 1558

Tahu film legendaris yang berjudul Rambo? Toko Rambo diperankan oleh Sylvester Stallone, merupakan salah satu aktor laga yang terkenal di tahun 1980an. Untuk lebih tepatnya, nama Stallone tidak hanya dikenal sebagai aktor, namun ia juga merupakan penulis skenario sekaligus sutradara terkenal.

Dibalik nama besarnya, Stallone tidaklah terlahir dengan sempurna sebagaimana manusia pada umumnya. Saat lahir, ia menderita paralysis atau lumpuh pada sebagian wajahnya, termasuk bibir bawahnya. Karena keterbatasannya ini, sejak kecil hingga menginjak usia remaja ia mendapatkan pendidikan disekolah berkebutuhan khusus.

Keterbatasan seorang Stallone tidak lantas membuatnya berhenti bermimpi. Sejak kecil, ia memang selalu menginginkan untuk menjadi aktor. Dalam perjalanan memperoleh mimpinya tersebut, Stallone sangat akrab dengan kegagalan saat mengikuti casting.

Baca juga: Ternyata Lalat dan Lebah Ini Mirip Sama Kehidupan Manusia, Lho. Simak, Yuk!

“Tidak ada penonton yang mau melihat seorang bintang film berwajah layaknya seorang mabuk dan tidak mampu bertutur kata dengan jelas,” adalah salah satu alasan mengapa Stallone kerap gagal dalam casting. Jika dihitung, jumlah tolakannya tidak tanggung-tanggung, lebih dari 1500 kali!

Sepertinya, kata menyerah tidak ada dalam kamus Stallone. Setiap ia mendengar ada casting, maka ia akan langsung mendatanginya. Pada akhirnya, sambil ia mengikuti casting sana sini, Stallone menulis sebuah skenario dan menjualnya pada sebuah produser film. Beberapa ada yang berhasil terjual.

Sebagai seorang penulis skenario yang pendapatannya tidak pasti, membuat ia ia diceraikan oleh istrinya. Ada saat dimana seorang Stallone harus menjadi seorang geladangan yang tidur di sebuah halte bus selama tiga hari.

Bahkan, ia harus menjual anjing yang ia sayangi hanya karena ia tidak mampu lagi untuk memberi makan anjing tersebut. Ia menjualnya hanya seharga $25. Dengan berat hati sambil menitikkan air mata, ia meninggalkan anjingnya pada pemilik yang baru.

Dunianya berubah sejak ia menulis sebuah skenario film berjudul Rocky. Sebuah skenario film yang hanya ditulisnya selama 20 jam saja. Ia mendapatkan sebuah penawaran yang fantastis untuk skenario ini, uang senilai $125.000 pun di tawarkan. Ia menolak. Bukan karena jumlahnya, tetapi ia ingin kalau pemain utamanya diperankan oleh Stallone sendiri.

Produser tersebut meningkatkan harga scknarionya menjadi $350.000, ia tetap menolaknya. Mereka ingin skenarionya, tetapi bukan Stallone. Sampai akhirnya produser tersebut sepakat untuk menerima Stallone sebagai pemeran utama hanya dengan bayaran senilai $35.000.

Dengan uang yang ia kantungi saat itu, ia kembali membeli anjing kesayangannya. Ia menjelaskan alasan mengapa ia memutuskan untuk menjualnya. Sayangnya, sang pemilik baru bersikeras dan mengatakan kalau ia tidak akan menjual anjingnya tersebut kecuali Stallone membayarnya $15.000. Dan ya, Stallone memberikan uang tersebut hanya untuk anjing kesayangannya yang semula ia jual $25.

Tetapi, keputusan seorang Stallone dan kegigihannya ini berbuah manis. Rocky menggaet tiga piala Oscar untuk film terbaik, sutradara terbaik dan scenario terbaik. Nama Stallone terus dikenal dan berhasil menjadi legenda dalam filmnya yang berjudul Rambo.

Dalam kehidupan, selain beriman, kita juga harus bekerja keras dan pantang menyerah. Stallone telah membuktikan kalau pengharapan dan kerja keras tidak akan mengecewakan kita. Sebagai orang percaya, kita harus memiliki nilai lebih dari orang-orang yang tidak mengenal Tuhan.

Sebab firmanNya mengatakan dalam Amsal 23:18, “Karena masa depan sungguh ada, dan harapanmu tidak akan hilang.” Mulai sekarang, jangan pernah menyerah dengan keadaan, karena Tuhan sendiri telah berpesan kalau masa depan yang terbaik untuk kita telah Tuhan sediakan. 

Sumber : jawaban.com

Konversi Kurs Mata Uang Mark Jerman (DEM) dan Rupiah Indonesia (IDR).

Konversi Kurs Mata Uang Mark Jerman (DEM) dan Rupiah Indonesia (IDR).

Ini Mark Jerman dan Rupiah Indonesia konverter up to date dengan nilai tukar atas 8 Maret 2018.

$ads.top320x100

Mark Jerman (DEM) adalah usang. Ini diganti dengan Euro (EUR) pada tanggal 1 Januari 1999. 
Satu EUR setara dengan 1,95583 DEM.

Euro (EUR) dan Rupiah Indonesia (IDR) Kurs Mata Uang Tingkat Konversi Kalkulator

 Mark Jerman (DEM)

<== Swap mata uang ==>

 Rupiah Indonesia (IDR)

Negara lain dan mata uang

Masukkan jumlah yang akan dikonversi di dalam kotak di sebelah kiri Mark Jerman. Gunakan &quot;Swap mata uang&quot; untuk membuat Rupiah Indonesia mata uang default. Klik pada Rupiah Indonesia atau Jerman Marks untuk mengkonversi antara mata uang dan bahwa semua mata uang lainnya.

Pilihan

Bulatkan ke satuan mata uang terkecil.
Hasil tidak dibulatkan.
DEMIDRcoinmill.com1.0087502.0017,4755.0043,70010.0087,37520.00174,75050.00436,875100.00873,775200.001,747,550500.004,368,8751000.008,737,7502000.0017,475,4755000.0043,688,70010,000.0087,377,40020,000.00174,754,80050,000.00436,886,975100,000.00873,773,975200,000.001,747,547,925DEM laju 
7 Maret 2018IDRDEMcoinmill.com10,0001.1420,0002.2950,0005.72100,00011.44200,00022.89500,00057.221,000,000114.452,000,000228.895,000,000572.2310,000,0001144.4620,000,0002288.9250,000,0005722.30100,000,00011,444.61200,000,00022,889.21500,000,00057,223.041,000,000,000114,446.072,000,000,000228,892.15IDR laju 
7 Maret 2018

Mark Jerman adalah mata uang dalam Jerman (DE, DEU). Dengan Rupiah Indonesia adalah mata uang dalam Indonesia (ID, IDN). Mark Jerman juga dikenal sebagai Deutschmark, dan Deutsche Mark. Dengan Rupiah Indonesia juga dikenal sebagai Rp. Simbol untuk IDR dapat ditulis Rp. Dengan Rupiah Indonesia dibagi menjadi 100 sen. Nilai tukar untuk Mark Jerman terakhir diperbaharui pada 7 Maret 2018 dari Dana Moneter Internasional. Nilai tukar untuk dengan Rupiah Indonesia terakhir diperbaharui pada 7 Maret 2018 dari Dana Moneter Internasional. Itu DEM Faktor konversi memiliki 6 signifikan digit. Itu IDR Faktor konversi memiliki 6 signifikan digit.

Copyright (C) 2003-2018Stephen Ostermiller | Kebijakan Privasi

New US Embassy in Jerusalem

SUBSCRIBE TO THE TIMES

MIDDLE EAST

New U.S. Embassy May Be in Jerusalem, but Not in Israel

The former Diplomat Hotel, now part of the United States consular compound in Jerusalem, was built on disputed territory.THOMAS COEX/AGENCE FRANCE-PRESSE — GETTY IMAGES

By ISABEL KERSHNER
March 7, 2018

JERUSALEM — In two months, the United States plans to open a new embassy to fulfill President Trump’s recognition of Jerusalem as Israel’s capital.

There’s just one problem: The embassy may be in Jerusalem, but it may not be fully in Israel.

The diplomatic compound that will serve as the American Embassy until a permanent site is found lies partly in a contested zone known as No Man’s Land.

No Man’s Land encompasses the area between the armistice lines drawn at the end of the 1948-49 war and was claimed by Jordan and Israel. Israel won full control of it in the 1967 war, so the United Nations and much of the world consider it occupied territory.

The State Department has avoided taking a clear position on the matter but relies on the fact that Israel and Jordan had informally divided the contested enclave.

ADVERTISEMENT

The provisional embassy site, in the Arnona neighborhood, “has been in continuous Israeli use since 1949,” the department said in a statement last week. “It is today a mixed residential-commercial neighborhood.”

The Palestinians are less equivocal.

“No Man’s Land is occupied territory,” said Ashraf Khatib of the Palestine Liberation Organization’s Negotiations Affairs Department. “Any permanent status for that territory should be part of a final status negotiation.”

The dispute could turn the American ambassador, David M. Friedman, an avid supporter of Jewish settlements in the occupied West Bank, into a new kind of diplomatic settler himself.

The plan is for the embassy to be housed in what is now the consular services section of the United States Consulate General in Jerusalem while the search is on for a permanent site. The fortresslike compound sits partly in predominantly Jewish West Jerusalem and partly in a section of No Man’s Land between West Jerusalem and predominantly Arab East Jerusalem.

ADVERTISEMENT

The American Embassy move veers from almost seven decades of American policy, and that of much of the rest of the world, which considers the status of Jerusalem subject to negotiation between Israelis and Palestinians, who each claim it as their capital. Critics say the embassy move prejudges the outcome of any future negotiations over the city.

But if the American recognition was already vague, leaving the eventual boundaries of sovereignty in Jerusalem up to the Israelis and the Palestinians, this odd quirk of political geography raises even sharper questions about which parts of the city the United States considers as Israel’s capital.

That requires some historical unpacking.

After the 1948 war surrounding Israel’s creation, Israel signed an armistice agreement with Jordan, which controlled the West Bank and East Jerusalem. The sides demarcated the armistice line on a map in grease pencil. Where they did not agree they drew their own lines staking out their maximalist positions — the Israelis in green, as far as possible to the east, the Jordanians in red, to the west.

The United States Ambassador to Israel, David M. Friedman, right, may be considered a sort of settler when the new embassy opens.POOL PHOTO BY HEIDI LEVINE

The disputed enclaves, called the “areas between the lines,” were under neither party’s control and came to be known as No Man’s Land.

ADVERTISEMENT

A senior United Nations official, who was granted anonymity to discuss a particularly sensitive diplomatic issue, said it was impossible to tell from the 1949 map exactly which parts of the Arnona consular compound sit where. The lines were drawn with the thickness of a crayon, and none of the current development in the area existed then.

But any part between the lines would be considered occupied territory, he said.

After 1949, both Israel and Jordan claimed the territory, holding that its status would be determined in an eventual agreement. When the 1967 war broke out, the Jordanian and Israeli armies fought over it.

Raphael Israeli, a professor emeritus at Hebrew University and a former Israeli delegate to the Israel-Jordan Mixed Armistice Commission, says that neither Israel nor Jordan had formal jurisdiction of it. “They simply invaded it,” he said.

Today, he said, after 50 years of Israeli possession and no country having had sovereignty over it beforehand, questions about its status are moot.

ADVERTISEMENT

“You can start making hairsplitting arguments,” he said, “but it seems so obsolete now. Things got blended together, and I don’t know any more which is what and what belongs to whom.”

After 1949, the Israelis set about fencing and farming land on their side of the territory. A Jordanian road to Bethlehem meandered through.

Both sides stationed troops in the zone. There were also instances of cooperation, such as when Jordan agreed to work with Israeli experts to eradicate a moth-borne blight infesting pine trees in the area.

But when an Israeli entrepreneur began constructing a hotel on a slope in the zone in 1963, the Jordanians lodged a complaint and the work was stopped.

ADVERTISEMENT

The hotel, named the Diplomat, was opened after the Israeli victory in 1967. Located on the grounds of the consular compound, it is now owned by the United States and leased out as housing for elderly Russian-speaking immigrants.

Before moving to Arnona in 2010, the American consular section that served Arabs and Jews was in East Jerusalem. The United States Consulate General that deals with the Palestinian Authority is in West Jerusalem.

Eugene Kontorovich, the director of international law at the conservative Jerusalem-based Kohelet Policy Forum, contends that by moving the embassy to the Arnona site the United States is recognizing Israel’s sovereignty over areas it captured in the 1967 war.

“Much more important than what the State Department says, it is what their actions say,” Mr. Kontorovich said. “You don’t build an embassy in territory that is not sovereign to Israel.”

RELATED COVERAGE

In Pursuit of Peace, Trump Generates Rare Friction With NetanyahuFEB 15, 2018A Quiet Jerusalem Neighborhood Gets a U.S. Embassy, and a SpotlightFEB 26, 2018Hard-Line Supporter of Israel Offers to Pay for U.S. Embassy in JerusalemFEB 23, 2018News Analysis: Did Trump Kill Off a Two-State Solution? He Says No, Palestinians Say YesDEC 7, 2017

ADVERTISEMENT

HelpSubscribeFeedbackTerms of ServicePrivacy

© 2018 The New York Times Company

In Jerusalem, but in Israel for US Embassy

SUBSCRIBE TO THE TIMES

MIDDLE EAST

New U.S. Embassy May Be in Jerusalem, but Not in Israel

The former Diplomat Hotel, now part of the United States consular compound in Jerusalem, was built on disputed territory.THOMAS COEX/AGENCE FRANCE-PRESSE — GETTY IMAGES

By ISABEL KERSHNER
March 7, 2018

JERUSALEM — In two months, the United States plans to open a new embassy to fulfill President Trump’s recognition of Jerusalem as Israel’s capital.

There’s just one problem: The embassy may be in Jerusalem, but it may not be fully in Israel.

The diplomatic compound that will serve as the American Embassy until a permanent site is found lies partly in a contested zone known as No Man’s Land.

No Man’s Land encompasses the area between the armistice lines drawn at the end of the 1948-49 war and was claimed by Jordan and Israel. Israel won full control of it in the 1967 war, so the United Nations and much of the world consider it occupied territory.

The State Department has avoided taking a clear position on the matter but relies on the fact that Israel and Jordan had informally divided the contested enclave.

ADVERTISEMENT

The provisional embassy site, in the Arnona neighborhood, “has been in continuous Israeli use since 1949,” the department said in a statement last week. “It is today a mixed residential-commercial neighborhood.”

The Palestinians are less equivocal.

“No Man’s Land is occupied territory,” said Ashraf Khatib of the Palestine Liberation Organization’s Negotiations Affairs Department. “Any permanent status for that territory should be part of a final status negotiation.”

The dispute could turn the American ambassador, David M. Friedman, an avid supporter of Jewish settlements in the occupied West Bank, into a new kind of diplomatic settler himself.

The plan is for the embassy to be housed in what is now the consular services section of the United States Consulate General in Jerusalem while the search is on for a permanent site. The fortresslike compound sits partly in predominantly Jewish West Jerusalem and partly in a section of No Man’s Land between West Jerusalem and predominantly Arab East Jerusalem.

ADVERTISEMENT

The American Embassy move veers from almost seven decades of American policy, and that of much of the rest of the world, which considers the status of Jerusalem subject to negotiation between Israelis and Palestinians, who each claim it as their capital. Critics say the embassy move prejudges the outcome of any future negotiations over the city.

But if the American recognition was already vague, leaving the eventual boundaries of sovereignty in Jerusalem up to the Israelis and the Palestinians, this odd quirk of political geography raises even sharper questions about which parts of the city the United States considers as Israel’s capital.

That requires some historical unpacking.

After the 1948 war surrounding Israel’s creation, Israel signed an armistice agreement with Jordan, which controlled the West Bank and East Jerusalem. The sides demarcated the armistice line on a map in grease pencil. Where they did not agree they drew their own lines staking out their maximalist positions — the Israelis in green, as far as possible to the east, the Jordanians in red, to the west.

The United States Ambassador to Israel, David M. Friedman, right, may be considered a sort of settler when the new embassy opens.POOL PHOTO BY HEIDI LEVINE

The disputed enclaves, called the “areas between the lines,” were under neither party’s control and came to be known as No Man’s Land.

ADVERTISEMENT

A senior United Nations official, who was granted anonymity to discuss a particularly sensitive diplomatic issue, said it was impossible to tell from the 1949 map exactly which parts of the Arnona consular compound sit where. The lines were drawn with the thickness of a crayon, and none of the current development in the area existed then.

But any part between the lines would be considered occupied territory, he said.

After 1949, both Israel and Jordan claimed the territory, holding that its status would be determined in an eventual agreement. When the 1967 war broke out, the Jordanian and Israeli armies fought over it.

Raphael Israeli, a professor emeritus at Hebrew University and a former Israeli delegate to the Israel-Jordan Mixed Armistice Commission, says that neither Israel nor Jordan had formal jurisdiction of it. “They simply invaded it,” he said.

Today, he said, after 50 years of Israeli possession and no country having had sovereignty over it beforehand, questions about its status are moot.

ADVERTISEMENT

“You can start making hairsplitting arguments,” he said, “but it seems so obsolete now. Things got blended together, and I don’t know any more which is what and what belongs to whom.”

After 1949, the Israelis set about fencing and farming land on their side of the territory. A Jordanian road to Bethlehem meandered through.

Both sides stationed troops in the zone. There were also instances of cooperation, such as when Jordan agreed to work with Israeli experts to eradicate a moth-borne blight infesting pine trees in the area.

But when an Israeli entrepreneur began constructing a hotel on a slope in the zone in 1963, the Jordanians lodged a complaint and the work was stopped.

ADVERTISEMENT

The hotel, named the Diplomat, was opened after the Israeli victory in 1967. Located on the grounds of the consular compound, it is now owned by the United States and leased out as housing for elderly Russian-speaking immigrants.

Before moving to Arnona in 2010, the American consular section that served Arabs and Jews was in East Jerusalem. The United States Consulate General that deals with the Palestinian Authority is in West Jerusalem.

Eugene Kontorovich, the director of international law at the conservative Jerusalem-based Kohelet Policy Forum, contends that by moving the embassy to the Arnona site the United States is recognizing Israel’s sovereignty over areas it captured in the 1967 war.

“Much more important than what the State Department says, it is what their actions say,” Mr. Kontorovich said. “You don’t build an embassy in territory that is not sovereign to Israel.”

RELATED COVERAGE

In Pursuit of Peace, Trump Generates Rare Friction With NetanyahuFEB 15, 2018A Quiet Jerusalem Neighborhood Gets a U.S. Embassy, and a SpotlightFEB 26, 2018Hard-Line Supporter of Israel Offers to Pay for U.S. Embassy in JerusalemFEB 23, 2018News Analysis: Did Trump Kill Off a Two-State Solution? He Says No, Palestinians Say YesDEC 7, 2017

ADVERTISEMENT

HelpSubscribeFeedbackTerms of ServicePrivacy

© 2018 The New York Times Company

Jesus did not die on the Cross recognized by Roman POPE

Finally! The Pope Agrees With Muslims “Jesus Did Not Die At The Cross”

May 31, 2017

 3 minutes read

Google+

See, when it comes to the bible, it is so consistent with the truth that there really is no room for confusion. Actually God is a God of order and one would expect to find nothing but consistency and order in His words.

The Pope in an address in New York said that “humanly speaking, ended in failure, the failure of the cross.“.

“I would like to express two sentiments for my Muslim brothers and sisters: Firstly, my greetings as they celebrate the feast of sacrifice. I would have wished my greeting to be warmer. My sentiments of closeness, my sentiments of closeness in the face of tragedy. The tragedy that they suffered in Mecca.”

“The cross shows us a different way of measuring success. Ours is to plant the seeds. God sees to the fruits of our labors. And if at times our efforts and works seem to fail and not produce fruit, we need to remember that we are followers of Jesus Christ and his life, humanly speaking, ended in failure, the failure of the cross.”

Let that sink in.

So first the Pope identifies himself with “my Muslim Brothers and Sisters”. Now, don’t get me wrong, but I love muslims. I have Muslim brothers and sisters and friends. But in faith are Muslims our brothers and sisters?

“The righteous should choose his friends carefully, for the way of the wicked leads them astray” (12:26). We should stay away from foolish people (13:20, 14:7), from people who lose their temper easily (22:24), and from the rebellious (24:21).

Although these close relationships are not recommended, it does not mean we turn our noses up and ignore unbelievers, either. Second Timothy 2:24-26 tells us that as servants of the Lord, we are to be kind to and not quarrel with anyone. We should gently teach those who oppose the truth, and be patient with difficult people.Matthew 5:16 tells us, “Let your good deeds shine out for all to see, so that everyone will praise your heavenly father.” We should serve unbelievers so that they may see God through us and turn to Him in praise. James 5:16 says that there is great power in the prayer of a righteous person, so bring your concerns for unbelievers before God, and He will listen.

What does the Koran say about Non-Muslims?

(9:5) And when the forbidden months have passed, kill the idolaters wherever you find them and take them prisoners, and beleaguer them, and lie in wait for them at every place of ambush. But if they repent and observe Prayer and pay the Zakat, then leave their way free. Surely, Allah is Most Forgiving, Merciful.

On unbelievers is the curse of Allah. – Sura 2:161

It is not for any Prophet to have captives until he has made slaughter in the land. – 8:67

Fight those who believe neither in God nor the Last Day, nor what has been forbidden by God and his messenger(Mohammed), nor acknowledge the religion of Truth(Islam), even if they are People of the Book (Christians), until they pay the tribute and have been humbled. – 9:29 (another source: ) The unbelievers are impure and their abode is hell. (another source: ) Humiliate the non-Muslims to such an extent that they surrender and pay tribute.

Are Christians infidels? YES TO MUSLIMS. Anyone that does not profess the Shahada is an idolater (worships another God that is nor Allah).

So from the scratch of it, Christianity and Islam are the stack opposites and both hold relationships with non-believers at ‘arms length’. For Christians, it is either to preach to the unbeliever or stay clear lest their influence compromises your faith. For the Muslims, well it says kill! (And the results, every 5 Minutes A Christian is Killed )

But how does the Pope then a man that professes Christianity call a Muslim his brother?

Well maybe because deep down, Islam and Catholicism are one? How?

Well for one, Muslims believe God cannot die.

 

“And because of their saying: We slew the Messiah, Jesus son of Mary, Allah’s messenger – they slew him not nor crucified him, but it appeared so unto them; and lo! those who disagree concerning it are in doubt thereof; they have no knowledge thereof save pursuit of a conjecture; they slew him not for certain”. S. 4:157

The closest Muslims come to the cross is admitting someone else was crucified or ‘it appeared to the people present’ that they crucified someone.

Now the Pope in His statement has said that ‘humanly speaking” Jesus died.

The common denominator in Islam and Catholicism is that “someone HUMAN” called Jesus died, but God did not die. (According to Islam God cannot die and now according to the pope just the ‘human’ Jesus died, not the “Jesus-Jesus”).

Who is a liar but he that denieth that Jesus is the Christ? He is antichrist, that denieth the Father and the Son. 1John 2:22

So the Pope can justifiably call Muslims his Brothers and Sisters in faith. And which faith is that? Well the faith of the Devil.

Only Satan would choose to convince you to believe Jesus Christ did not die at the cross. Why? Because it is by the death of Christ at the cross that completes our salvation.

Did Jesus Really Fail At The Cross As The Pope Said? Pope Francis Vs Apostle Paul

Ben Carson Calls The Pope 'Holy Leader'

Related Articles

 Mar 5, 2018

 11

Nigerian pastor murders pregnant choir lover and two others to conceal affair

 Mar 5, 2018

 11

Andrew Henriques :Time of Trouble. ‘Billy Graham Dead,Expect Great Revival.’ Black Panther & Pope’s Docu-Series

 Mar 5, 2018

 11

Venezuela’s woes spread to zoos as animals feed on each other

 Mar 5, 2018

 19

Facebook and Google’s ‘days are numbered’ George Soros

 Feb 23, 2018

 54

US to move embassy to Jerusalem on 70th Independence Day

 Feb 23, 2018

 117

HINDU NATIONALISTS ATTACK CHRISTIANS AND BURN BIBLES

 Feb 23, 2018

 75

“Transgender” Principal Wears a Dress on ELEMENTARY Campus. Parents Aren’t Happy…

 Mar 3, 2018

 20

Florida House approves bill to post “In God We Trust” in all public schools after school shooting

 Feb 23, 2018

 125

CHILD WHO KILLED PEDOPHILE TO ESCAPE SEX TRAFFICKING RING GETS LIFE IN PRISON

 Feb 23, 2018

 88

Bill Gates’ Former Doctor Says Billionaire ‘Refused To Vaccinate His Children’

Advertisement

Follow Us

139kFans1,006Followers

Popular Articles

Andrew Henriques :Time of Trouble. ‘Billy Graham Dead,Expect Great Revival.’ Black Panther & Pope’s Docu-Series

 Mar 5, 2018

Venezuela’s woes spread to zoos as animals feed on each other

 Mar 5, 2018

Facebook and Google’s ‘days are numbered’ George Soros

 Mar 5, 2018

US to move embassy to Jerusalem on 70th Independence Day

 Feb 23, 2018

HINDU NATIONALISTS ATTACK CHRISTIANS AND BURN BIBLES

 Feb 23, 2018

Advertisement

© Copyright 2018, All Rights Reserved

FacebookTwitterGoogle+WhatsAppTelegram

Australian Slaves

.    

Allan Chirpy Campbell .

Yes let talk about Terrorism in Australia for 228 years and ever since 1788 the White Invader's not only Invader's our Aboriginal Country and Stolen it from us they have been committing Terrorism among our Aboriginal for over 228 years and still doing it, so why done you White Invasion Terrorism just get out of our Aboriginal Country. the same way you come into our Country. JUST LEAVE. ????
.
Tom Cox
Tom Cox Do u understand the meaning of the word terrorism ? Do u understand the difference between Isis and the people who founded this country ? U need to re-educate yourself better yet just get an education
.
Allan Chirpy Campbell.
Tom Cox what would you call when you white Invasion people invader's my country in 1788.
.
Rob Ross
Rob Ross Hey tom relax mate.
Ole mate here is upset no need to insinuate hes a dummy.

.    
..................   
.....................................   
.

'The Son of Man Coming in the Clouds of

I humbly submit the release of...

The Testimony of Yahuchanan

This book is a 'game changer' and I pray all who read it see 'The Son of Man Coming in the Clouds of Heaven'

Below is a free copy of the .pdf

https://www.dropbox.com/s/nygn4swdv20f11s/TESTIMONY%20OF%20YAHCHANAN.pdf?dl=0

This is the first book, I am restoring all the books in The New Testament (the writings of the Nazarenes). I will keep these books "free" in .pdf form to honor all those Nazarenes who have and continue to invest in the restoration of the Scriptures to that we can maximize our FRUIT for His Kingdom.

If this book is a blessing and you would like to invest in His Kingdom by supporting this effort to restore all the books in the New Testament click on the link below for more information:

http://sabbathcovenant.com/the-word-of-hist-testimony-restored-by-rav-shaul/

Blessings,
Rav Sha'ul (the Nazarene)